![]() However, if you don't spec for AA then why should one expect good AA, Secondaries performance? LOL I've been doing Yamato AA Build recently and it does make a difference. This is proven by my own stats and by server stats. ![]() Hence Musashi wins more, plain and simple. Musashi has the advantage of being T9 ship that can either bring inferior T9 ship on the opposing team roster, or get into battle with no T10 ships on the opposing side to shoot at it. These two ships are one and the same, there's no difference between these ships. As in pretty much exactly identical, percentage of hits and damage done. The difference in sigma does not matter squat in optimal distances, I played Yamato and Musashi side by side in over 200 battles, and they are identical. The 460mm on Musashi are not for smashing T7 ships, they are for smashing equal tier Iowas and Missouri BBs bow on (now, unlike pathetic secondaries and AA, I can attest that those 460mm do indeed work). Top tier CVs will not feel any difference between attacking Yamato and Musashi, in fact Musashi might be better off with two fighters that have longer uptime, just to disrupt the drop patterns. Yamato secondary and AA armaments are largely useless, I can't recall a single instance when it actually did anything.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |